Case studiesLitigation

Illustrative playbookLitigationBoutiques & solo counsel

Never lose the next date: running a contentious list without a diary in one person's head

A litigation team moves its hearings and filing deadlines out of one person's diary and onto a firm-wide list, with stale entries flagged so a date nobody has touched does not quietly pass. The list survives whoever is in court that day.

Illustrative playbook — no firm is named and no result is claimed. Every step is a capability LexVitta ships today.

LinkedInEmailWhatsApp
Four colleagues in business dress around a meeting-room tableLitigation · Hearings & deadlines

What a firm would measure to prove it

Dates held outside the systemHearings found in a personal diary but not on the matter
Time from hearing to recorded outcomeHours between the listed time and the outcome note on the matter
Deadlines with no ownerTracked dates where no fee-earner is assigned

The challenge

In most contentious practices the authoritative list of dates is a diary, and the diary belongs to a person. When that person is in court, on leave, or has left the firm, the list is still there — but nobody else can read it the way they did.

The damage is rarely a missed hearing. It is the hour spent every morning reconstructing what is due, and the client who learns a date changed because they happened to ask.

The system

  1. 01

    The matter is the record, not the folder

    Client, matter type, practice area and the fee-earners assigned are created together, so there is one place a date can belong to.

    Case Management →
  2. 02

    One list the firm can read

    Hearings and filing deadlines sit on a firm-wide list with stale entries flagged, rather than in a calendar invitation that leaves with the person. Linking a hearing to a specific matter is in build.

    Hearings & Calendar →
  3. 03

    The outcome is recorded where it happened

    The adjournment and the new date go onto the matter from a phone, in the building, rather than from memory two days later.

    Hearings & Calendar →
  4. 04

    The client hears it from the record

    When your team posts the new date as a case update, the client reads it in their own portal instead of phoning to ask. Surfacing hearings on the portal automatically is in build.

    Client Case Portal →

What changes

  • The firm's list is readable by the firm, not by one person
  • A changed date reaches the client without anyone drafting an update
  • Handover is reading the matter, not interviewing a colleague
  • Preparation starts from what is actually due this week

See your own list on one record.

Thirty minutes, walked through against your own matters and the dates you are carrying this month.